Hi HyperAgent maintainers,
I was looking at HyperAgent and noticed a trust/documentation gap that may matter for adoption: browser automation agent; strong safety-boundary fit, but likely more commercial.
The first useful pass would be to prepare a capability reality map and external-action boundary review.
I am offering a fixed-scope repo documentation rescue plus agent safety map.
The deliverable is simple:
- what the agent can actually do today
- what is mock, dry-run, or live
- where approval is required before external actions
- what proof or receipts exist
- the next safest upgrade that would make the project more credible
I only need the public repo. No account access, no secrets, no live changes, and no external actions.
The entry pass is 199 USD.
I can send a one-page sample outline first, based only on the public repo, so you can see whether it would be useful.
Would that be helpful for HyperAgent?
Repo I reviewed: https://github.com/hyperbrowserai/HyperAgent
Hi HyperAgent maintainers,
I was looking at HyperAgent and noticed a trust/documentation gap that may matter for adoption: browser automation agent; strong safety-boundary fit, but likely more commercial.
The first useful pass would be to prepare a capability reality map and external-action boundary review.
I am offering a fixed-scope repo documentation rescue plus agent safety map.
The deliverable is simple:
I only need the public repo. No account access, no secrets, no live changes, and no external actions.
The entry pass is 199 USD.
I can send a one-page sample outline first, based only on the public repo, so you can see whether it would be useful.
Would that be helpful for HyperAgent?
Repo I reviewed: https://github.com/hyperbrowserai/HyperAgent