Bug report
% cat leak.py
def f():
__foo = 1
class X[T]: ...
return __foo
f()
% python3.12 leak.py
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/jelle/py/cpython/leak.py", line 5, in <module>
f()
File "/Users/jelle/py/cpython/leak.py", line 4, in f
return __foo
^^^^^
NameError: name '_X__foo' is not defined. Did you mean: '__foo'?
The PEP 695 implementation of generic classes turns on name mangling for the type parameter scope, but never turns it off afterwards. As a result, all code that appears syntactically after the PEP 695 scope also gets mangling applied to it.
I have a fix for this, but I believe applying it requires updating the magic number, and I'm not sure we can afford to to do that on the 3.12 branch.
Linked PRs
Bug report
The PEP 695 implementation of generic classes turns on name mangling for the type parameter scope, but never turns it off afterwards. As a result, all code that appears syntactically after the PEP 695 scope also gets mangling applied to it.
I have a fix for this, but I believe applying it requires updating the magic number, and I'm not sure we can afford to to do that on the 3.12 branch.
Linked PRs