Skip to content

Fix typos and clarify error handling for missing ttlMs#2747

Open
spacewander wants to merge 5 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
spacewander:patch-1
Open

Fix typos and clarify error handling for missing ttlMs#2747
spacewander wants to merge 5 commits into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
spacewander:patch-1

Conversation

@spacewander

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Breaking Changes

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

Signed-off-by: spacewander <spacewanderlzx@gmail.com>
@spacewander spacewander requested review from a team as code owners May 19, 2026 06:12
@localden

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@CaitieM20 can you please take a look?

Comment thread seps/2549-TTL-for-list-results.md Outdated
CaitieM20
CaitieM20 previously approved these changes May 21, 2026

@CaitieM20 CaitieM20 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@spacewander this looks good to me, applied one minor patch to clarify the error handling is for backwards compatibility only, since ttlMS is required.

Merged in latest from main, I think you may need to re-run sep generation and style checks, and then I can merge.

Signed-off-by: spacewander <spacewanderlzx@gmail.com>
@spacewander

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@CaitieM20
Thanks. Files updated.

@spacewander

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@CaitieM20
Would you take a look at this PR? Thanks!

@localden localden added the rc-high-priority Related to an upcoming specification release and needs to be addressed with a high priority. label Jun 24, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

rc-high-priority Related to an upcoming specification release and needs to be addressed with a high priority.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants