Skip to content

Clean-up Changes appendix - #521

Merged
Tavmjong merged 4 commits into
masterfrom
changes-cleanup
Aug 10, 2018
Merged

Clean-up Changes appendix#521
Tavmjong merged 4 commits into
masterfrom
changes-cleanup

Conversation

@AmeliaBR

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tidying up the changes appendix. See commit messages for details.

Shouldn't really be any normative changes here, but I'd appreciate someone else taking a quick look to make sure I haven't broken anything.

I suspect that I'll find a few more missing changes as I go through the rest of the implementation review. But, it's still probably better to merge this sooner rather than later, so that other PRs (which all change the changes appendix, of course) can be rebased over top.

Other PRs will also need minor edits to add links to issues and PRs, as well as annotations to indicate that they are changes since the August CR, so that the tidy-up can last more than a few days!

(Since the people most frequently mentioned aren't active working group members anymore, anyway.)
- Make sure there's a section for every chapter & appendix from SVG 1.1, and every one in SVG 2, and indicate which is which.
- Put a list of all the major re-organizations in the "Editorial Changes" section at the top.
- Added a few other missing changes, and corrected a few others.
- Removed the testing links for the Linking chapter (still to be determined where/how best else to include this, but probably not here).
Also revert the removal of change-log history related to z-index (while still making the final outcome clear), and make clear that its removal was a deferment.

@svgeesus svgeesus left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is much clearer. The (SVG 1.1 only / SVG 2 only) annotations are helpful; and the textual descriptions of chapter splits, merges and deletions are better.

@svgeesus svgeesus left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah these owners were kind of pointless.

@svgeesus svgeesus left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Obviously better to be in the same order as the current document.

@svgeesus svgeesus left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Much better with the links to individual PRs and issue discussion.
Agree with your decision on z-index history.

@Tavmjong

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Good work! I also agree with the decision on z-index.

@Tavmjong
Tavmjong merged commit e899cea into master Aug 10, 2018
@AmeliaBR
AmeliaBR deleted the changes-cleanup branch August 13, 2018 01:32
AmeliaBR added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 13, 2018
- Add issue/PR links to the changes that were just merged (PR #485 and #430),
  to be consistent with patterns from PR #521
  (Next time, need to remember to do this before merging!)

- Used consistent wording for removed appendices.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants